Showing posts with label Land use planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Land use planning. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

SOSCP – Building Capacity in the Region

by Bryn White


The South Okanagan-Similkameen Conservation Program (SOSCP) and community partners (Keremeos, Oliver, Summerland, Regional District Okanagan Similkameen) have worked collaboratively to establish the South Okanagan and Similkameen Local Government Ecological Standards and Practices Capacity Building Initiative. This is a collaboration is supported by the Real Estate Foundation of BC Communities in Transition Program. Phase I is underway. Here are the highlights:

  • The SOSCP is a collaboration of organizations including senior governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and local governments that has increased the partnership level and engagement of rural/non-metro communities over the past few years on land use planning and conservation;
  • Local governments are a "high priority" partner to work with because they have great influence over land use and conservation;
  • SOSCP created a regional environmental planning table that brings together planners and resource people to learn, identify priority issues and needs for support, and a forum from which to advance sustainable land use planning;
  • Our research and partnership development clearly pointed to the fact that there wasn't the capacity for communities to move forward on challenges around the use and conservation of land – including implementing and improving ecological standards and practices in their planning and land use decision making processes; 
  • SOSCP and communities agreed that it was imperative that capacity be addressed to be able to advance sustainable land use practices that protect wildlife, healthy ecosystems and the goods and services they provide human communities.

Collaboration

SOSCP and communities established a collaborative approach to capacity building – they pooled exisiting funding resources and worked together to apply for external funds from Real Estate Foundation of BC CIT program, as well as from other sources such as the federal Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP). This enabled the establishment of a shared environmental planning contractor, that works within the communities to assist them in achieving their environmental planning objectives. In addition, there are other resource people and mentors that work to support that environmental planner. The SOSCP administers the contract and guides the workplan in concert with the communities according to their needs.

The environmental planner's work consists of:
  • Creating consistent baseline information across the region to address ecological values. This includes ecosystem mapping, identification of environmentally sensitive areas, and in some cases, recognition of special features and hotspots.
  • Providing leading edge information pertinent to land use bylaw provisions (official community plans), development permit areas (derived from ecosystem mapping) or other suitable mechanisms to protect ecosystem values.
  • Establishing sources of ecological expertise for local governments engaged with the development community at the neighbourhood or site plan level, thus helping ensure recognition of sensitive ecosystems/ connective corridors in the planning approval process.

Interesting points
  • This isn’t an approach widely applied – communities within regions rarely share resources;
  • It is a challenging position for the environmental planner – three distinct communities with different needs and issues;
  • Environmental planning is a skill set that is rare – it is imperative that there be a community of resource people/projects/examples from which to draw;
  • Internal environmental planning expertise is absolutely necessary for communities – it is hoped that they will recognize this need and find a way to resource it in the future – hopefully collaboratively;
  • It has increased the trust and strengthened the relationships between the conservation community (gov’t and non-govt) and local governments/development/private industry.

For more information about this project or the South Okanagan-Similkameen Conservation Partnership, please contact me directly.


Bryn White, ManagerSouth Okanagan Similkameen Conservation Program
102 Industrial Ave.
Penticton, BC V2A 7C8
Tel: (250) 490-8225
Fax: (250) 490-2231
Email: bryn.white (at) gov.bc.ca
Web: www.soscp.org

NOTE:
In 2008 the Governors of the Real Estate Foundation of BC granted $150,000 to The Nature Trust of BC (one of the partners in the SOSCP collaborative) to support the program coordination, research, education, and land use planning functions of the South Okanagan-Similkameen Conservation Program through 2008-2011. For more information on recent grants approved by the Governors of the Real Estate Foundation of BC please click here.

©Real Estate Foundation of BC / 2010. We encourage the reproduction of articles on this website non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Transit Girl: Karin Kirkpatrick talks about the transition to transit



Karin Kirkpatrick is the Executive Officer at the Real Estate Foundation of BC, a position she assumed in November 2008. She describes her role as "working closely with the Board, with staff, and with a number of NGO’s and government groups to try and prioritize how best the Foundation’s funding can be used." She adds that the majority of that funding goes towards projects that support responsible sustainable land use planning. 


CITinfoResource editor hanspetermeyer interviewed Karin in February 2010. A few weeks before, Karin parked her car and started using public transit. She also decided to post regularly (as "Transit Girl") on Facebook about her experiences, making the switch from private car to public transit.


hpm: I'm interested in your decisions, to park your car and to begin posting as Transit Girl. What motivated you to do these things?

Karin:
I’ve always wanted to be able to park my car, but I've always found excuses to stop me from doing that. I guess the Olympics forced my hand. I knew it was going to be a nightmare to try and get into my parking downtown, so I thought “You know what? This is the chance. Let’s just try and see how this goes.”

I started posting about it because – well I guess it’s like being a recovered smoker who’s discovered something that now seems really easy, and you want to just tell everybody else about it. So, I started having some fun by writing about it.

hpm: Are there many transit options where you live?

Karin:
I live on the North shore, so there are lots of transit options from there to where I work in downtown Vancouver. With my car it's just a short drive over the Lions Gate bridge and come downtown.

hpm: What is the cost, in terms of time and dollars, for you to use your car to commute?

Karin: Well, there is the extra insurance to drive to work every day. It’s probably $300 for monthly parking downtown. And there are all the associated costs with the wear and tear of your car, and the gasoline that you are consuming.

hpm: How long would it take to get back and forth?

Karin: It would only take ten minutes, which becomes an issue in two conflicting ways. First, it's pathetic that I would drive that short distance with all the costs associated. Second, it is a struggle to rationalize the difference in time between using my car and using transit: when you hold it in your mind that time is money, well, it’s just another excuse for getting into the car.

hpm: What type of transit have you been using, and how long does it take you to get to work using transit?

Karin: I’m taking the bus and sometimes I’m taking the Seabus. It depends where I’m coming from. Using the regular bus, it’s probably about twenty minutes to get downtown. Added to that is a 10 minute walk on both sides of that. So, I have gone from maybe ten minutes out of my garage to maybe forty minutes with transit, door-to-door.

hpm: Is there an upside to using transit?

Karin: There is a huge upside. And it’s not just the cost: It’s my physical health. This is "accidental exercise." I can’t say that I’ve regularly exercised for twenty minutes a day before this. Also, I'm walking more downtown. It’s embarrassing to say, but if I had a meeting that was on the other side of downtown, sometimes I would actually drive my car and park it in another parkade. But now I can’t do that. I am walking. So the amount of walking I’m doing has increased dramatically – and it makes me want to walk more and be outside more!

hpm: We are in the middle of the Olympics, so obviously traffic and congestion downtown is crazier than it normally is and yesterday you took your daughter to a hockey game via transit. What was that experience like?

Karin: That transit experience was fun. We got on a bus on the North Shore and we came downtown and hopped off. We walked around and looked at the flame, and then got on the Sky Train which dropped us off at Stadium station in Chinatown. From there we were able to walk a couple of blocks and get into the venue. My daughter had fun with that, and I felt like a tourist in my own city. When I went down into the terminal for the Expo line and the Millennium line I realized I’d never been there before. I’ve travelled all over the world and I’ve taken taxis and transit all over Asia, and I have a much better sense of what those terminals look like than I ever did in Vancouver. It was kind of fun because it was new.

hpm: So your experiences as Transit Girl are familiarizing you with the City's transit highlights you'll be trading your position at the Foundation for one as a transit tour guide?

Karin: That's it: I’ll be Transit Girl the transit tour guide. But it is true Hans, that I’m seeing places in my city that I’ve never seen before. When you are walking and when you are taking the bus you are looking around and noticing. Cruising by a store you think, “Wow, I’ve never actually looked in the window of this place before." And I actually stop enroute on the way home and I’ll buy a few groceries to take home. This is in contrast to before, when I would drive straight from the underground parking downtown to my house, and then if I decided I needed groceries I’d get back in my car and drive to the grocery store  and drive home again. But now, because I’m already out and I feel way more connected to the community around me, I am actually stopping and doing those things enroute. It’s not just the transit to and from work; in general, I’m using my car less.

hpm: You live in an urban area where there are a number of transit options, but I’m interviewing you as part of the work that I do with the Communities in Transition program. Our focus is non-metro areas. For example, I live in the Comox Valley. We have a bus system, but we certainly don’t have a subway, SkyTrain, or even a ferry shuttle between Courtenay, Comox, and Royston. Like most non-metro BC communities, our transit opitions are much more limited than what you've been experiencing. Can you tell me what you are doing as the Executive Director with the Foundation that connect your experiences as Transit Girl with things happening in small communities.

Karin: You’ve got to make it easy for people to get out of their cars, and that’s been my excuse: It’s always been "too far to walk." I can only imagine in a rural community, where there isn't an extensive or convenient transit structure, that "too far to walk" is both an easy and legitimate excuse. The distance you have to go to access transit is just not realistic. 

Where I live, a bus comes every ten minutes. If you are in a smaller community where you are not supported with transit, it's a lot of effort to plan things out, to get where you need to get, and sometimes you can’t get there. 

The answer? At the Foundation we think it's important look encourage others to look carefully at how they are planning communities, to be constantly looking at the sprawl that isn’t supported in the initial planning and finding ways to respond to that, to be asking of new developments, “What is the transit plan here? How can we make this a place where people don’t need to drive their cars?  What kind of things can we do to be more creative about how we are putting public transit in?”

hpm: Does the Foundation look at applications from non-metro communities that deal with transit and transportation issues?

Karin: What we are doing is not necessarily specific to smaller communities but we believe it will have a benefit to them. In general terms, the Foundation is supporting and conducting research to identify economic and social values of good public transit and the impact that it has on the community. That is very broad, but we are trying to show that it is not just your carbon footprint you are reducing when you choose public transit, but it also makes for better communities where people are aware of each other and there is more social interaction. There is research that we are funding that we think will influence community planners in communities large and small, urban and rural. 

Transit is important to us and it is on the radar. Even before I got on the bus I was a high supporter of transit. I personally have no issue with extra gas tax, and no issue with extra parking tax. I myself understand the importance of these measures. The irony is that even though I understood the importance and value of public transit, I was still not using it.

hpm: Was this because of your role at the Foundation or were you already heading in this direction?

Karin: I think I was already headed in this direction, I was very conscious of it. Also, I have a seven year old daughter who came home from grade 1 earlier this year and asked me to make her a "zero waste lunch." That was a very hard thing to do. So there was an "influence from below," in terms of the changes we have to make in our lives. 

Another factor is a "mobility issue" I have related to a broken leg and a broken back. For me, this was a big concern: What will it be like, getting on a bus. I can’t stand for long period of time, but because I don’t have a cane or anything obvious, people don’t accommodate me when I’m on the bus in terms of sitting. These were huge reasons for me, as to why I couldn’t take public transit. Happily, these haven’t been issues at all and I just need to make sure I get on at stops when I am always going to get a seat and I plan it out. 

I think this current transit experience is another example of "influence from below" from my daughter. I’m aware that if she can think about this, then I should be able to think about and act on this as well.

hpm: You’re comments on mobility are important also given the aging population in our communities, and particularly in communities with limited transit options. Let's talk about how someone with a good transit-related land use project makes an application to the Real Estate Foundation of BC. Where would I go to find out more information from the Foundation about that process?

Karin: Start by going to our website. We're updating the site, and there's going to be some new information. Our priorities have changed as well, but I’ll come back to that and tell you about the kind of applications you should be submitting, but our website is www.refbc.com. There is a section about grants and grant applicantions and the kinds of things that we are looking for in the grants. 

In terms of our priorities, we are now specifically looking at projects that are going to be innovative. I know that's a big word that can be described in different ways. We are encouraging non-profits, municipalities, and communities to come up with different ways to solve some of those same problems. If you're challenge is transportation, we'd like to see a unique approach to that issue. It may be something that's been tried in larger communities, but never in a small community. We're also very interested in projects that could be replicated or modeled for other small communities. That would be very attractive to us in terms of grants. 

And yes, we are very interested in transit, transit infrastructure, and how that can support a changing demographic in a small communities as well, because as you say, people are aging and there are going to be mobility issues. Things will be changing in our communities. Some things we've taken for granted – our mobility, for example – are going to become more difficult. We're going to find people who are living in a house that is far from services, and suddenly they can’t drive anymore. What kind of things can be put in place to make sure that those people don’t necessarily have to move out of their home, just because they don’t have access to transit?

hpm: Thank you very much for taking this call this morning. As Transit Girl, do you have any closing comments? Are you going to keep posting?

Karin: Here's a closing comment on transportation in the Vancouver area: We have so much water access, and I think we can certainly look at other ways, without building bridges and creating more car passenger access, of getting people around the Lower Mainland. There was a ferry that had been going from Bowen Island to the foot of 14th in West Vancouver, and then dropping people at the foot of Bute here downtown, and then going around to Granville Island. I was really excited about that. Unfortunately, due to some challenges related to parking among other things, it's been discontinued. 

As far as Transit Girl goes, I am actually having fun on transit. Even on those bad days, when there is a big line up and I’m standing out in the rain, I’m still feeling really good about what I’m doing. It gives me exercise, and something to harass my driving friends about.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Project Reviews: First Nations Comprehensive Community Planning


CURRENT CIT PROJECT OVERVIEW: 
First Nations Comprehensive Community Planning: Musqueam and Sliammon

The Real Estate Foundation established the Communities in Transition (CIT) program to focus on issues related to use and conservation of land that primarily affect non-metropolitan regions of BC. Established as a signature program of the Foundation, CIT works with a wide range of project and funding partners in communities across BC to help them plan for and make transitions.

Two recently completed projects in Comprehensive Community Planning by First Nation's communities at Musqueam and at Sliammon relate to the Foundation's interest in sustainable land uses, integrated planning, and innovation. Sustainable land use planning and practices have been ongoing themes at the Real Estate Foundation through most of its 20+ years.

Currently, the Foundation is preparing detailed case studies of these projects. Both projects suggest positive models for First Nations communities making the transition to local government status. Each of the two projects include innovative features, in terms of comprehensive planning and community engagement, that will be of interest to all rural communities and consultants working with similar regional concerns.


____________________

Sliammon Comprehensive Community Plan (CCP)

PROJECT PARTNERS
Funding and in-kind support for the Comprehensive Community Planning project came from a variety of partners including: 
  • Indian and Northern Affairs Strategic Planning Unit
  • BC Treaty Commission
  • City of Powell River, and the 
  • Real Estate Foundation of BC.

GRANT AWARDED BY REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION OF BC
$40,000 (2005)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Sliammon First Nation (SFN) is a relatively small community adjacent to the City of Powell River and surrounded by the Powell River Regional District on the Mainland coast several hours north of Vancouver. As of 2009, SFN has been involved in treaty negotiations for close to 15 years, a period that has included some land use related conflicts with adjacent local governments. In contrast to the nieghbouring non-First nations community, SFN occupies a limited land base with a young and rapidly-growing on-reserve population. This planning initiative originally emerged from treaty negotiation experiences and was conceived as a pilot in intergovernmental planning, engaging Sliammon and the adjacent local governments.

Sliammon is, as Chief Negotiator Roy Francis describes it, making the transition "from an Indian Band to a First Nations government," a process that involves "fairly traumatic, huge changes." He describes "the purpose of the Comprehensive Community Plan [as] all about mapping out a plan for those changes." Or, as Pre-Implementation Manger Laura Roddan summarizes it: the CCP "was about getting ready for the day after treaty."

The project addressed a number of challenges and several are critical issues facing all First Nations governments, as distinct from other forms of local government in BC. Funding arrangements with senior government departments have historically limited (First Nations') planning to physical land use planning, included broader service responsibilities, and generated "silos" of funding and service provision that inhibit collaboration and integration. During the past 15-year period SFN was also engaged in a treaty negotiation process, and the resolution and/or mitigation of land use conflicts with local governments.

When assessing the success of the project and the resulting inter-governmental relationships Francis is positive. He notes that the City of Powell has taken the project-related protocol agreement to the Union of BC Municipalities, and presented it as a model for building working relationships between government and First Nations. "These relationships are still new and evolving... The approach and outcome has been a hugely positive thing for us... [it] came out to be a very good thing for Sliammon." 

CONTACT
Laura Roddan, Pre-implementation Manager, Sliammon (and Project Manager, Sliammon CCP)
email: lroddan@sliammontreaty.com

COMMUNITIES IN TRANSITION  BACKGROUND
An overview of the project details, as proposed in 2005, is available here. 


The Real Estate Foundation of BC is currently preparing a case study of the Sliammon Comprehensive Community Plan project. It will be posted online.


_______________

Musqueam Comprehensive Community Plan (CCP)

PROJECT PARTNERS
Funding and in-kind support for the Comprehensive Community Planning project came from several sources, including: 

GRANT AWARDED BY REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION OF BC
$45,000 (2007)

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Musqueam First Nation (MFN) is a small but rapidly growing community located within the greater Vancouver region. With a relatively young population and a relatively high rate of birth, Musqueam faces significant pressures to plan and develop their at-present limited community lands in a sustainable fashion. 

Aware of the challenges facing their community and of the limits of conventional planning (as previously carried out under the auspices of the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada) Musqueam leaders decided that a community-based approach to planning and developing the community was critical. As Leona Sparrow, Director of Treaty, Lands & Resources Department, notes,
"The full integration of the Land Use Plan with the broader ‘We Speak with One Heart and One Mind’ community planning process is a fundamental departure from past, engineering and infrastructure focused physical development planning" 

Several elements are key to the Musqueam project. One was the element of time. Similar to the Sliammon First Nation, Musqueaum, and particularly staff and leadership, had been informally "in preparation" for the CCP for a number of years, in part through the treaty negotiation process. Secondly, Musqueam took an "entrepreneurial" approach to funding the planning project. Using their own resources, and successfully sourcing other funding, Musqueam was able to conduct the kind of planning and community engagement process that fits their needs, rather than be limited to funders' criteria. Musqueam also engaged in an extensive process when choosing the consultancy for the project. Again, as with Sliammon, there was an emphasis on internal capacity-building, and wherever possible staff or on-reserve resources were used.

The proponents believe that the project exceeded expectations in several areas. These include capacity building within local governance and staff structures, particularly with regard to strategic planning skills and utilization. Capacities for civic engagement have also been strengthened as community members were brought effectively into the discussion about the future of Musqueam. On-reserve and off-reserve communications have been strengthened. The use of several "quick start" projects in response to community-identified needs during the process also helped build credibility, capacity, and momentum for both the project and its outcomes.

CONTACT:
Dianne Buchan, Associate Director, Treaty, Lands & Resources Department, Musqueam First Nation
email: dianne.buchan@musqueam.bc.ca

The Real Estate Foundation of BC is currently preparing a case study of the Sliammon Comprehensive Community Plan project. It will be posted online.


We strongly encourage the reproduction of articles on this website non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Research and development of sustainable tourism in BC's rural communities

by Dr. Nicole L. Vaugeois, Vancouver Island

University


I am one of a number of BC Regional Innovation Chairs located in several non-metropolitan BC communities. George Penfold, a regular contributor to

the CITinfoResource, is a RIC at Selkirk College in Castlegar [see his current article in this issue, on rural development]. Dr. John Church is the RIC in Catttle Industry Sustainability at Thompson Rivers University in Kamloops [profiled in May 2009 at CITinfoResource]. The mandate of the BCRIC is to support rural communities that are diversifying their economic base. Amenity-bas

ed industries like tourism are a significant focus, and the RICs initiative emphasizes sharing innovation, ideas, and insight amongst BC communities, academic communities, and amongst the RICs themselves.


My focus at Vancouver Island Unversity is on sustainable tourism development for rural areas, something I've been working on for some time before being appointed to the RIC position. With a range of communities across BC, I've participated on projects that are successfully building capacity for tourism planning decisions. Many of these projects draw on the expertise of a network of academic, government, and non-government (NGO) partners. For example, since 2006 a multi-partner collaborative project has brought faculty and students out into rural regions of the province to engage in research projects and to share knowledge in presentations and workshops. It's called the Tourism Research Innovation Project, or TRIP, and you can find it online at www.trip-project.ca. TRIP has become self-sustaining and will continue enabling communities to tap into a variety of resources. The products from the project are intended to be free of cost and easy to access. All TRIP how-to manuals, innovation snapshots, videos, reports, and presentations are available for download from the website.



Linking Post-secondary Resources and Rural Opportunities

In my experience, the most valued resource that programs like RIC and TRIP can offer rural communities is the time and energy provided by University students. Through my work I've been able to act as a “knowledge broker,” connecting communities that have jobs to be done with faculty and students who have the necessary skills and interest. The list of jobs is varied and includes running focus groups, doing signage audits, conducting inventories, to name a few.


Our teams have been able to mobilize relatively quickly to respond to and collaborate with community partners to conduct a number of “participatory rural appraisals” to meet their information needs. For example, teams have worked in MacKenzie, Wells/Barkerville, Likely, and Gold River to provide on the ground assistance with information gathering. The success of this model is showing up in requests for similar collaborations from other communities. Given the demand, I am looking forward to finding more ways to bring teams into the field to engage in this type of activity.


Another example of successful extension activity relates to community signage, often cited as one of the biggest planning issues for tourism development in rural BC. The problem is one of enabling area visitors to navigate a rural region and discover and enjoy the "assets" of the area. Our team has developed a “how-to manual” on community signage that gives community decision-makers critical information on how to assess and improve signage. We've also provided teams of students to do “signage audits” for communities and businesses. This is a win-win situation: students love to do real-life projects that have real-world benefit to communities; and communities get important tourism planning work done that might helps them build their capacities.



Fostering Innovation in Sustainable Tourism

In the spring of 2009, I worked with colleagues from Thompson Rivers University, College of the Rockies, and University of Northern BC on a project called Fostering Innovation in Sustainable Tourism, or FIST. Our purpose was to identify examples of BC communities and tourism-related businesses that were leading the way in sustainability. Once located and interviewed, we developed a variety of tools to share these innovations. We developed a video, a manual of “Made in BC” innovators, and wrote a research report that outlines overall adoption of "sustainable" behaviours by rural operators. Many of the operators profiled have demonstrated valuable and successful ideas related to land use planning. By gathering these stories and creating means for sharing innovation, we are giving operators in other communities the opportunity to move more quickly to sustainable practices.


Based on my experience of working with rural communities, there is no shortage of ideas or desire by community leaders and business owners to develop 'sustainable' practices. Academic institutions can play a valuable role in supporting rural areas in economic transition – if they can find ways to get out into communities, form and maintain relationships, and provide timely resources such as research or students to help them make their decisions. It's exciting to see what our program in Tourism and Sustainable Rural Development at Vancouver Island University has accomplished in a short period of time. With Regional Innovation Chairs established in a number of non-metropolitan BC communities I'm optimistic that rural communities now have an established research and development tool to support their work in tourism innovation.



Current projects

I am currently developing a workplan to guide the VIU RIC research agenda for the next couple of years. It's important to me that it is responsive to the needs of the rural communities we work with, and I encourage groups and individuals to contact me. For our work to be of benefit, we need to hear about community needs, and to explore opportunities for synergy on existing projects.


In the meantime, I'm looking forward to BC’s first Rural Tourism Conference being organized in the North Shuswap region http://redtree.tru.ca/Conferences/index.htm from April 6-8th. Many of the lessons learned by those working in rural tourism throughout BC will be shared there. Our goal is to develop networks and to continue sharing lessons learned in the future. I encourage all readers of the CITinfoResource, and all CIT project partners to she would like to attend.


For more information about what I doing as the RIC at VIU, please visit my website at http://web.viu.ca/vaugeois. I also keeps a blog on sustainable rural tourism at: http://ruraltourismdevelopment.blogspot.com/


- 30 -



About the author:
Dr. Nicole L. Vaugeois is the BC Regional Innovation Chair in Tourism and Sustainable Rural Development at Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo. The BC Regional Innovation Chair (RIC) in Tourism and Sustainable Rural Development was established in October 2008 at Vancouver Island University and is held by Dr. Nicole L. Vaugeois. The Real Estate Foundation of BC has invested in several RICs throughout the province through contributions to endowment funds. These are part of the Foundation's investment in supporting professionals and lay practitioners in moving towards more sustainable use and conservation of land in BC communities. Foundation support for Dr. Vaugeois' chair supports research and development of sustainable land use practices involving tourism in rural British Columbia.

©Real Estate Foundation of BC / 2010. We encourage the reproduction of articles on this website non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Doug Makaroff talks about Resilient Cities, Gaining Ground 2009 #GGRC09

Doug Makaroff has over 19 years in the land use planning and development field, primarily with private clients working on various sustainability projects. He is currently leading the Living Forest Communities initiative. He talked to CITinfoResource editor hanspetermeyer on January 4,2010 about his experiences at the Resilient Cities Gaining Ground Summit of October 2009.

©Real Estate Foundation of BC / 2010. We encourage the reproduction of articles on this website non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

CURRENT CIT PROJECT OVERVIEW: Smart Growth on the Ground in Prince George

by hans peter meyer with files from SmartGrowth BC

The CIT program at the Real Estate Foundation of BC is a response on the part of the Foundation's Governors to land use related issues that primarily effect non-metropolitan in nature. Established as a signature program of the Foundation, CIT works with a wide range of project and funding partners in communities across BC to help them plan for and make transitions.

A recently completed project in the City of Prince George relates to supporting sustainable land uses and planning for climate change. Sustainable land use planning and practices have been ongoing themes at the Real Estate Foundation through most of it's 20+ years.


Smart Growth on the Ground in Prince George

Project Proponents: Smart Growth on the Ground, the City of Prince George

Project Partners: BC Heritage Branch, BC Hydro Powersmart, Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Green Streets Canada, Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources Canada, Northern Development Initiative Trust, Prince George Community Foundation, Ramada Prince George, Transport Canada,Vancity, and the Real Estate Foundation of BC.

Smart Growth on the Ground (SGOG)
SGOG is a unique partnership program formed by Smart Growth BC, the Real Estate Institute of British Columbia, and the Design Centre for Sustainability at UBC. It was designed to help BC communities create more sustainable neighbourhood plans using community-specific solutions. Prince George joins Maple Ridge, Squamish, and Greater Oliver as the fourth partner community to set a new standard for community planning and establish leadership among the municipalities of BC.


Project Overview
The recent Gaining Ground: Resilient Cities (GGRC09) event in Vancouver was a showcase of challenges facing communities and of innovative responses to these challenges. In the case of Cam Brewer's presentation on the outcomes of a recent Smart Growth on the Ground (SGOG) project in the City of Prince George, it was an opportunity to show how one CIT project is helping this northerly BC city take strong steps towards neighbourhood resilience and sustainability, in the process helping the City meet its targets for greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) reduction.

Cam Brewer is the Executive Director of SmartGrowth BC, the organization that, in partnership with the Real Estate Institute of BC (REIBC) and the Design Centre for Sustainability at UBC, delivers Smart Growth on the Ground (SGOG) projects around the province. In 2008 the Governors of the Real Estate Foundation approved two substantial grants to SGOG projects in Prince George: $65,000 to Smart Growth BC for research, education, and stakeholder consultation associated with SGOG in Prince George; $90,000 to REIBC for real estate economic analysis and stakeholder convening activities of SGOG in Prince George.

The news that Brewer delivered to the 600 participants of GGRC09 was that Prince George City Council had recently unanimously approved the SGOG Concept Plan. In his words, Council is advancing a "bold new vision for downtown Prince George."

Created by the community, the SGOG Concept Plan outlines a compelling image of what downtown Prince George will be in 2035. It is a downtown with housing options, a vibrant public realm, bike lanes, and a permanent Farmer’s Market. Smart Growth BC sees Council's adoption of this vision as placing the City in a leadership role with regard to renewable energy and is support for all members of the community.

Central to the Concept Plan is a prominent green space with water feature that connect downtown to the Fraser River. Councillor Dave Wilbur was struck by the “grand, insightful vision” that identifies the rivers as core to the concept. "If we had that slip away, let the rivers just run by and not be identified, I think we would've missed a big opportunity," he said. "But [SGOG] didn't. You made it core to your concept plan and I appreciate that."

In his presentation to Council, Dan Milburn, the Manager of Long-Range Planning remarked on the collaborative nature in which this plan was created. “Throughout this process the partners have worked diligently to raise the necessary funds for this project, organize an extensive community consultation program, coordinate numerous researchers, and facilitate the creation of what I like to think of as a community plan for the downtown. For it truly was a community effort producing a community vision.”

The Concept Plan is the result of a year-long public engagement process that involved participation of over 500 citizens. Through five public workshops participants set priorities, targts and discussed ideas for invigorating downtown. During a four-day, multi-stakeholder design event (a "charrette”) held May 12-15, 2009 over 40 people collaborated to create the vision. The charrette team included Mayor Dan Rogers, Councillors, City staff, community participants, researchers, and designers. Councillor Stolz, a member of the team, attested that “the people involved sweated blood and tears” to produce this vision.

The Concept Plan was approved along with a recommendation to amend the Official Community Plan to “align the downtown vision, objectives and policies with the key concepts articulated in the Downtown Prince George Smart Growth on the Ground Concept Plan.” This will entrench the vision in policy and will guide implementation projects.

Project Rationale
"Smart Growth BC receives applications for projects from many BC communities," says SmartGrowth's Shana Johnstone. "We chose Prince George for the SGOG project for a number of reasons. Of particular note for us was that we are interested in working on climate change at a neighbourhood planning and development level. The City of Prince George was very keen on this, and were early signatories of the Climate Change Charter.

"We also chose Prince George because it is part of our mission at SmartGrowth BC to develop a suite of tools and applications for a variety of communities and situations across BC. As a 'northern community,' and as a community with a particular set of challenges when it comes to things like climate change, a resource transition economy, and a hub for other northern destinations, the City's proposal was a good fit."


Click on these links for more information about:

©Real Estate Foundation of BC / 2009.
We encourage the reproduction of articles on this website non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the authors of all reproductions, including in-house uses.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]