Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Whistler's Naomi Devine talks about her Climate Project training

image courtesy of ©SayZu

Who is Naomi Devine, and why is she of interest to CITinfoResource readers? Here's what her bio at the BC sustainable Energy Association says about her:

Naomi Devine"Naomi is a climate change and sustainability policy advisor … responsible for overseeing the Whistler2020 community process and working on Whistler’s Official Community Plan review. In her previous position as the Sustainability Coordinator for the Resort Municipality of Whistler (RMOW) she worked on the creation of the Carbon Neutral Operations Plan, and created the Climate Action Innovation Fund, which directs carbon tax money into commercial and municipal emissions reductions projects. Prior to this, Naomi worked in the University of Victoria’s office of Campus Planning and Sustainability, creating the university's first sustainability policy and action plan.

"In November 2007, Naomi was appointed to British Columbia's Climate Action Team, which offers the Government’s Cabinet Committee on Climate Action policy advice on measures to achieve legislated greenhouse gas reductions. She is a co-founder of Common Energy at the University of Victoria, an organization that works to move organizations 'beyond climate-neutral' and is a co-author of the report: Building on Progress: A Plan to move the University of Victoria Beyond Climate-Neutral. Naomi is currently a Director with the BC Sustainable Energy Association, and founding chair of the Victoria Chapter."


Naomi Devine is one of a handful of people in the province of BC dedicated to working on issues related to climate change and how small-to-medium sized communities can adapt to and mitigate the changes that are taking place.

In late June Naomi was on her way to Tennessee. She talked to hanspetermeyer about her trip to Nashville, Tennessee to train with Al Gore as part of the Climate Project. What's the Climate Project? From their site..."The Climate Project supports more than 3,000 diverse and dedicated volunteers worldwide who have been personally trained by former US Vice President and Nobel Laureate Al Gore to educate the public and to raise awareness about



What's next?
Now that Naomi has completed her training and returned to BC she's looking for opportunities to practice what she's learned: giving a version of the Al Gore "Inconvenient Truth" climate change presentation to communities in BC. She'll be wanting to connect the larger climate change picture to what's happening in our communties, in terms of the kinds of changes we'll be seeing, and also the kinds of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies we're putting together.

If your community has gone through, or is about to start a sustainability planning process you might consider getting in touch with Naomi. She's a smart, dynamic, and passionate individual with lots to add to whatever sustainability conversation is happening in your community.

Following Naomi

One of the best ways to get a handle on who Naomi is and what she does is to follow her on Twitter - that will also give you a way to get in touch with her. She can also be reached via the Resort Municipality of Whistler.

©Real Estate Foundation of BC / 2010. We encourage the reproduction of articles on this website non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Engaging the "sustainability conversation"

I've been involved in sustainability related topics since the mid-90s. Back then, local governments were wary of "sustainability" – the "3-legged stool" of economy, social, and environment was threatening to the "old business as usual" approach. Only a few organizations – one of them was the Real Estate Foundation of BC – seemed to understand that talking about sustainability was a way to get past ideological growth vs. no-growth polarizations.

We've come a long way
Sustainability isn't a dirty word anymore. Asking questions about growth, where and how it happens, whether or not it's sustainable – these are now part of what most politicians, civic staff, citizens, and even developers see as due diligence.

On the road to the "mainstreaming" of sustainability, however, we seem to have lost some of our passion for public meetings on the topic. Last year, for example, my once highly-charged, highly-participatory community by and large failed to get excited by a region-wide sustainability strategy process.

Apathy and its discontents
Do we fail to fill the halls because of process burnout? Or process suspicion – "they" never follow through on what we've wanted in the past, why should I participate now? Or is it because things like "sustainability" and "regional growth strategy" are just too vague, too far removed from the everyday issues most of us are dealing with?

I'm not sure. But, as one of my mentors used to say, "Local government is the 'hell's kitchen of sustainability." Engagement with local processes is how we do real work around sustainability. It's how we protect our investments in our families, homes, neighbourhoods, and communities. We can't afford to stay away from the kitchen, no matter how hot the fire, for a number of reasons:
  • because we the citizens are footing the bill for expensive planning processes;
  • because we the citizens as taxpayers deserve better results than we're getting;
  • because, if we don't get better results, we the citizens (as taxpayers) will be footing expensive bills for failing infrastructure, for inadequately preparing our communities for the impact of climate change preparation; and, finally,
  • because – as homeowners – if we don't engage meaningfully, we aren't protecting our investments in our homes and properties.

You can't spin authenticity
That said, I don't see any quick fixes on the road to civic participation. Open houses, public meetings – I'm not the only person they fail to engage. But I don't think we should stop using them. Face to face, real-space contact is important. But as recent case study work for the Real Estate Foundation of BC is showing, there are many ways to engage people when it comes to planning the future of our communities.

One of these ways is via new technologies and media. When these are applied to civic engagement they tend to be labelled as GOV2.0 or OPENGOV. Across the globe there are exciting examples of governments are using new technologies to share information and, generally, make real-time conversations between government and citizens possible. But they aren't a silver bullet. As far as I can see, there is no short cut to animating people and getting good information and ideas into the flow of governance and decision-making. Whatever we do, it'll take time – and "authentic" investment in trust-building.

This means that local governments can't expect miracles from either a consultant or a sexy new technology. No consultant can use social media to deliver engagement if local government isn't committed to being honest, open, and "authentic" online. You can't – as one of my communications mentors puts it – "spin" authenticity.

When it's real... it's about leadership, not technology
I work with local government on an ad hoc, as-needed basis to provide various communications related services. I'm watching examples of GOV2.0 grow and change in a host of places across the globe. What am I learning? That GOV2.0 isn't just about using social media. And it certainly isn't about having a consultant drop in and set up online presence for 3-12 months.

GOV2.0 – where it's real and working – is about civic leadership. It's about chutzpah and starting real conversations in a variety of places. It could be through a regular column in the local newspaper. Or a regular blog online. Or a regular online video on YouTube. Or a regular podcast.

Regular. Consistent. Every week, or every month. In a space that encourages (ie. makes it super easy) for we the citizens to comment and respond. And (this is critical), responsiveness. To respond to every (every!) comment. Promptly. As in, Now.

What if local government isn't taking the great leap forward?
If your local leaders aren't stepping into the risky business of authentic engagement there is still a lot that citizens can do to generate the needed conversations about sustainability in community. The regional sustainability strategy (rss) in my area is an example. It may not work in all communities; in our region it generated an informing parallel conversation to the rss. More than that, it's continuing to stimulate conversations about sustainability months after the official process finished. We now have a number of lively conversations about buildings, land use, conservation, transportation, and the future taking place across a variety of (mostly Facebook) sites.

Meet people where they are. Speak with your own voice.
Are more people going to turn up for public meetings related to sustainability in the Comox Valley because of this? I don't know. Conversations take place in different venues, through different media. Some take place in open houses. Many take place via letters to the editor in the local paper. Growing numbers are online. The beauty of online venues is the opportunity for authentic, direct conversations that aren't heavily structured or mediated, and that can't be "managed."

Civic engagement is the blood that flows through the veins of our governance structures. If we're serious about meeting sustainability challenges, we need healthy flow. Local governments can help by using a range of media to talk about changes in the community, about possible responses, and about policy directions. If people are not coming to meetings, don't expect them to come to meetings. If they're talking about sustainability online, join the conversation online.

Yes, this is risky. But the return on investment of honest, open engagement is proving to be high in jurisdictions that are taking the risk. Which is why local government needs to be doing it's own social engagement. Sure, hire someone to help walk you through the process, maybe even to kick things off. But in the end, high visabilityz folk need to be active (sometimes it's the Mayor, or a Councillor, or a CAO or Director or Planning). Then, when the sustainability roadshow comes to town, the channels are already open and conversation bubbling. There's no trick to it.

...and in the end... stop fretting!
Let's stop fretting about empty chairs at public meetings. Instead, let's get active in other ways of engagement, from local newspaper columns to cable TV columns to the wide and expanding options online. If local government isn't picking up the GOV2.0 ball, lets create our own channels and invite them in. I like what people like Councillor Michele Rule in Kelowna, Arjun Singh in Kamloops, Naomi Devine in Whistler (to name a few) are doing online and in real-space. Take a look at their various channels.

Be inspired, not disappointed. We have new tools. People are making them work in lots of places. And they're fun to use!

hanspetermeyer
Editor, CITinfoResource


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Resilient Cities and Regenerative Regions

A manifesto of consciousness, commitment and action.

editor's note: The following post is the summary address given at the 2009 Gaining Ground Resilient Cities summit by noted sustainability planner and practitioner Mark Holland. Mark was invited to summarize and comment on the preceeding 2 days of presentations. What follows is his inspired – and inspiring – response to the challenges and gifts of the 600 or so gathered for this event. CITinfoResource thanks Mark for allowing us to repost here. It is also posted as a PDF for download at the GGRC09 site.

by Mark Holland

We hereby now accept that human beings are an urban species and that cities are now our true home.  And as such, we will embrace our cities and focus our attention to change them however necessary to not only provide us all with a good quality of life, but to deliver that life within the carrying capacity of our planet – we will create one-planet cities.

While we acknowledge that we are an urban species, we acknowledge likewise that we are a fully integrated part of the natural systems of our planet and that we are entirely dependent on the health of the world’s ecosystems for all our needs.

We acknowledge that we have undertaken two centuries of industrial and population expansion following a flawed model of our world and we now acknowledge the realities of the 21st century that we have created including:
·      That our actions are causing climate change emissions to increase at rates never before seen or modeled and this will cause our climate to change significantly this century even with radical action, and catastrophically without it;
·      That the inexpensive energy supplies that we have used to build our current society and economy will end in this century and thereby force change in every aspect of our cities;
·      That our world’s potable water supplies are decreasing at unprecedented rates in urban and agricultural watersheds thereby changing forever our cities and food-baskets;
·      That we have disrupted our planet’s ecosystems  to a such a point that they are in a rapid state of change and collapse in a manner that is serious and unpredictable;
·      That we have been exhausting the non-renewable resources of the planet and depositing  waste and toxins at unprecedented rates due to our past outdated economic models of materials management;
·      That our global food supply is in significant threat from the impending peaks of fossil fuels, water supply and soil degradation;
·      That the impending global migration from countries heavier hit from these disruptions will change our entire concept of cities as billions more become urbanized in a steadily decreasing number of metropolitan regions;
·      That the significant shift in demographics in our countries will force change in our cities physically, socially and economically and in particular, ruling many of our models of how we take care of each other obsolete;
·      That our political systems are currently inadequate and under-resourced to respond to the primary areas of market and government failure and compromised in their ability to effectively lead the envisioning, coordination, mobilization and decision-making  processes required to deliver a culture of stewardship and become sustainable;
·      That the health of individuals and families in our communities are suffering from an inestimable and growing array of stresses that exceed our social infrastructure’s ability to respond;
·      That our education systems in their current forms are entirely inadequate to empower us collectively with the knowledge and ingenuity that we need to grapple with the challenges we face;
·      That our media and information industry is inadequate in its current form to support a rapid and effective dissemination of information that will trigger emotions, understandings and motivation to make significant change;
·      That our current economy and its corporate members are built on principles that are blind to the constraints of the planet and our communities; and
·      That the belief that the economy will be relatively stable and reliable in its current state over the next century is erroneous.


In acknowledgement of this reality as the new context for our cities, we commit in all our actions from here on, to envisioning, communicating, and creating resilient cities that will deliver a great quality of life for all generations within the constraints of the planet that we are borrowing from our grandchildren.

Which brings us to the principles and perspectives we need to forge a path forward:
Inherent in this commitment is the recognition of the following principles that underpin our thinking around resilient cities including:
·       That the future is not inevitable, but rather that it is created by us day by day – that we are the authors of our future;
·       That no one is in charge, and therefore that we all are in charge;
·       That we are not moving from  a past state to a future one, we are moving from a past state to one of continuous unfolding and unstoppable change – and therefore, our concept of cities, communities,  economy, and ourselves must be reframed as a dance of relentless and rapid evolution – that change is the new normal;
·       That at the heart of resilience lies the capacity to regenerate and as such, we must preserve the integrity of our earth’s ecosystems and utilize them as blueprints for our cities;
·       That because cities change slowly, our decisions today define not only tomorrow but the day after tomorrow, and the day after that.
·       That in the face of the inability to know the future, we must adopt a deep ethic of planning, education and engagement to ensure we are aware, thoughtful and agile to meet the future we are both consciously and unconsciously creating;
·       That the roots of the transformation that we need lie in our deepest places because emotions lead to thoughts, which lead to stories, which lead to motivations, which lead to actions, which build cities;
·       That everything is connected and that the dispassionate karma of the earth offers a reaction for every one of our actions;
·       That we must transform our cities from a parasitic to a symbiotic relationship with our all other species in the world;
·       That we can never truly understand all implications of our actions and that as such, we must adopt an ethic of “learning cities” – of living laboratories in which we hope to succeed, but plan to fail, and then to try again;
·       That we must pause in our work to build our Towers of Babel, and return to the ground and learn to speak each other’s language – or we must certainly fragment and disperse and divided we will fall;
·       That the scale of change we need can only be realized when we work together to coauthor a future that fits us all;
·       That we must strive for ‘firsts’ in everything as the only mandate possible to deliver the  learning and change at the scale we need to meet the challenges that call our names; and
·       That  in fact, we aren’t building cities, we are building communities and as such, our cities do not exist for themselves, they are emergent outcomes of decisions we make to provide homes and lives for ourselves, our families and each other. In this context, we must never forget that we must design cities to be positive and healing places for our children.  And furthermore, because there is no “social out there” any more than there is an ecological “out there”, we must confront our fears and work to heal those who have been hurt or have hurt us - for pain is a virus that is passed on until it is confronted and healed – and while in action, it hurts all species.

Which brings us to the need for a new blueprint for a resilient city:              
In the context of the 21st century reality and these principles, we now embrace a new blueprint for our cities:
·       Our neighbourhoods will hereby be complete, offering us choice in where we work, live, play, learn, shop and pray;
·      Our transportation systems will maximize exchange and minimize travel, they will deliver access for all of us at all stages of our lives with a complete absence of carbon and will be built first and foremost around us - people - walking, meeting each other, experiencing beauty and engaging the other species with whom we share our landscapes.   We will travel under our own power, under the suns power and we will travel together;
·      Our buildings will be plants, generating their own sustenance and giving back to our city,  providing light, life and sunshine to us all, for our buildings are our civilization’s collective skin;
·      The land within our cities will be a profound cacophony of the celebration and cosmic dance of the lives of other species by our design, they will make us physically and spiritually healthy, they will provide us with food, and they will be a stage on which we come to know each other’s power and creativity;
·      The pumps, pipes and wires of our cities that supply us with energy and water and deal with our waste will be designed to be like the earth herself where everything is regenerated and there is no such thing as waste;
·      Our cities will provide food, clothing, a home, education, health care and a good quality life for every person, no matter what gifts, gaps or wounds they have;
·      Our cities will inspire us with art and the expressions of who are and will answer implicitly the question – what in fact we are trying to sustain?; and
·      Our economy will be built on the shoulders of inspired corporate citizens, creative entrepreneurs and a vision that draws all self-interested individuals and organizations to not only compete, but cooperate for the benefit of us – one and all.   To create wealth within the natural income of our planet, and to increase our social, natural and economic capital accounts.

In order to implement this blueprint, everyone has roles and responsibilities:
While we innately know we are a “we” – we also accept that we do nothing as a “we.” It is an “I” who acts or at most, a small “us.”   And even then, all “us’s” are animated, organized and lead by an “I.”

In this context, we all have responsibilities individually, in our roles, in creating our collective resilient future. In our roles, there is no one else to pass the responsibility on to.

·       As elected city leaders:
o      We will accept our responsibility to be students, decision makers, arbitrators, gatekeepers, motivators, teachers, and risk takers, on behalf of all our citizens.  We will be fearless but careful, bold but honest.

·       As those who work in our city governments:
o      We will honour our responsibility to not let the aging ink of dog-eared and faded regulations constrain our souls, but will use our skills and the letters of our laws to make real the dream of a regenerative society;   We will not hide from the expressions of both ignorance and wisdom from our neighbours, but will engage in dialogue to teach and be taught . We will not let the failures of courage of those who must make hard decisions, define what our minds and souls believe is possible.  We will expose who we are in the public discussion to build a common ground of humanity with those whom we serve, and at the same time we will protect who we are from those who would project anger that they received  those who may have abused authority in the past – so we may serve tomorrow without yesterday’s pain.

·       For those of us who create wealth in our businesses:
o      We will embrace our responsibility to not only create wealth for ourselves and our shareholders, but to also infuse the tasks and lives of our employees and colleagues with meaning.  We will relentlessly add value and provide goods and services that meet both the physical and spiritual needs of our customers.  We will lead our suppliers and competitors forward – inspiring and asking of them increasing levels of sustainability.  We will commit to create lasting wealth and make the planet and our communities healthier and more resilient as we do so. 

·       For those of us in the academy:
o      We will honour the significant investment our society makes in us and commit to relentlessly leading the research and reframing of our world views to empower the minds and hearts of all to understand and reach for true sustainability.  We will not only speak to those who pay us, but will actively engage the minds of all citizens in our communities and economy.  And we will commit to being the sensors who report on our planet and to being the strategists of symbiosis.

·       For those of us in the world of organizations:
o      We will be both insiders and outsiders at the same time – working “with” our communities, and leading them forward simultaneously. For every place we call others out, we will discipline ourselves to provide a viable alternative. We will honour the significant responsibility and risk those in our governments and businesses face and with compassion and discipline, we will tell the truth in a story that all can understand and remember – and be inspired by. And often, we won’t wait. We’ll just do it because we can.

And finally, as we bring our “we” and all things down to ourselves as individuals we find that all things begin within ourselves.  And therefore, with a sobering but exciting knowing that I do not truly know how to proceed, I will begin with commitments to try. 
As a resident and co-author of a resilient city and regenerative region, I commit to the following:
·       I will embrace my responsibility as an author of the future and of my city;
·       I will confront my comforting illusions – but will not believe all those who would feed me news that might prey on my anxieties;
·       I will accept my disillusionment with all institutions and leaders, but will not take leave my responsibility and become embittered;
·       I will learn from whomever I can - but will never devolve my responsibility to be the author of my city to any teacher, no matter how gracious their words or beautiful their pictures;
·       I will engage my peers and declare our generation’s responsibility - but I will share my successes and failures equally;
·       I will accept that I must live in this world, but will commit to slowing to look beyond the fog of overwork, lack of sleep, gridlock, shopping, and the apparent race with others in everything to nowhere in particular – to find my quality of life within my earth’s allowance;
·       And I will be grateful;
·       I will breathe deep,  I will smile at the rain, I will soak in the sun, and I will teach my children the songs of the birds who live in our neighbourhood;
·       I will eat and drink the abundance of my region, and will share my abundance with those who work to maintain that land’s capacity;
·       In addition, I will share my abundance with many others in a manner that empowers them to create more of their own;
·       I will ask of myself the courage to see the challenges that give me fear through the eyes of those whose job it is to deal with them and I will be a compassionate, engaged and disciplined citizen;
·       And I will be grateful;
·       I will open to the pain that I cause in the world through my ignorance and fear and the distance I seem to have from my internal dignity and nobility, and I will feel the pain, shock and injustice of participating in the death of so many, if only by accident – and then I will move past that grief to the restless serenity of my responsibility – to my planet, to my community, to my family, and to myself;
·       And in that spontaneous map that comes from that honesty, I will find my well, the source of my regeneration and I will personally become resilient;
·       And I will be grateful.

And finally, I will acknowledge that I do not understand the universe enough to yet proclaim that “its over” and as a resident of a resilient city and regenerative region I will have faith in you and I will have faith in myself that we can do this – that we can change.  


October 22, 2009
4
©Mark Holland / 2009-2010 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Executive Director's Notes: Resilient Cities, the Foundation, and Learning from China

by Karin Kirkpatrick

The Real Estate Foundation is involved in a wide range of projects and activities, all of them related to land use. In these notes I will talk a little about why we are involved with the leadership work being done through the Gaining Ground summits, my reflections from my recent time in China, and the positive work being done through an initiative funded in part by the Foundation.

The Real Estate Foundation and Resilient Cities
Between 1981 and 2001, Greater Vancouver experienced population growth of nearly 60%. If similar rates of growth continue, we will see a doubling of population in the next 40 years. This presents all of us living here with significant challenges. Vancouver is known for its vibrancy and quality of life. How do we sustain these in the face of the kinds of changes that are projected? We think that the Resilient Cities conference, the 6th in the Gaining Ground Summit series, speaks to this challenge.

As a theme, "Resilient Cities" is timely and appropriate for this year's Gaining Ground summit, the first here in Vancouver. The key elements of the conference align with the goals and values of the Real Estate Foundation:
  • innovation in sustainability governance and best current practices for managing sustainable urban systems;
  • capturing opportunities in the green economy;
  • strategies for building widespread sustainability collaborations that engage the community level.
The Foundation has been a leader in supporting projects with a focus on better, more sustainable land uses and practices. Resilient Cities is, in many ways, an excellent example of where our experiences with project partners over more than 20 years has brought us as an innovative granting organization. It represents important, cutting edge ideas and practices that are being used to make communities more sustainable, more resilient.

Because of the word "real estate" in our name, and perhaps also because we do much good work in communities on housing issues, the Foundation is sometimes seen as being primarily concerned with housing. But that misses our primary focus: a concern over that place where the built environment meets the natural environment, and the delicate balance between settlement and nature that is required for our communities to thrive. We're involved in this year's Resilient Cities conference because it speaks to that focus.

UBC Design Centre for Sustainability
An example of how the Real Estate Foundation works with innovative organizations to meet society's growing need for better land use and development practices is the Design Centre for Sustainability at UBC. It is, to put it simply, a widely recognized academic leader in applying sustainability concepts to the development of land, cities, and community. An example of how this can be applied to our communities is the recent City of North Vancouver 100 Sustainability Vision, which I'll describe later.

We are fortunate at the Real Estate Foundation to be able to make different "investment" decisions than many public and private funders. Innovative projects often require long-term investment in order to reach the level of maturity at which they flourish and give the kind of ROI our communities need. In some cases, the Foundation Governors have chosen to make these kinds of investments. This is the case of with the multi-year, multi-project Sustainability by Design initiative at the Design Centre for Sustainability.

The project's operating principle is that sustainable solutions, applied at the scale of the neighbourhood, if widely replicated, may be the crucial ingredient for a sustainable region. This fits closely to the overall purpose of the Real Estate Foundation.

The Design Centre helps partner communities provide context to their planning and design process by framing sustainability collaboratively. They work with communities to identify or review: an overarching, long-term sustainability vision; guiding principles; general goals and more specific objectives in each issue or theme area (for example, transportation, energy, water, climate change, etc); associated indicators and targets; and, finally, implementable strategies and actions. These are then expressed in relevant policy and planning documents, such as the community's Official Community Plan.

Through a charrette process, the Design Centre engages a wide diversity of community members, municipal staff, professionals, and representatives from public, private, and not-for-profit organizations in the planning and design-process—from developing the community-specific sustainability framework to selecting appropriate indicators and targets and developing the concept plan.

The return on investment? As I mentioned, the City of North Vancouver's 100 Sustainability Vision is one of the ROI. The City is one of the first municipalities in BC to investigate the feasibility of meeting the province's GHG emission target established by the 2007 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets Act (80% GHG emission reduction from 2007 levels by 2050). The 100-Year Sustainability Vision illustrates how an 80% GHG reduction target may be met, and explores how the City will move towards net zero GHG emission by 2107, its 200th birthday. This project recently won the UBCM's Community Excellence Award. That's an ROI for us at the Foundation to be proud of!

Learning from China
Over the past few years I've had the pleasure and privilege of travelling to China as part of my previous teaching work through UBC. I recently got home from spending 10 days there in Beijing, Xi'an, and Shanghai. These 10 days, in these rapidly changing cities, brought home to me the value of what I see the Foundation supporting: the need to take an integrated approach to community planning, to consider transportation, food security, energy consumption, water supply, livability, parks, and healthy lifestyles all as important elements in our quality of life. It helped me appreciate even more the purpose and importance of the Resilient Cities conference that many of you will be participating in over the next several days. It also helped me appreciate even more deeply the work of the many organizations and projects – like the work being done by the Design Centre for Sustainability, for example – that we support through the Foundation.

I visited the Shanghai Urban Planning Center. It was rather amazing, in light of what we are doing in Vancouver, to see their focus on designing interesting (and big!) buildings catering to a rapidly emerging car culture. My personal experience was a little unsettling: sidewalks that abruptly end in the middle of going somewhere; not being able to cross the simplest of streets without the fear of being run down. Roads are getting wider and more abundant – while walking routes are being blocked or not considered. All of it contrary to what we are seeing as elements in more sustainable cities, particularly as it is being exemplified by our local brand, sometimes referred to as "Vancouverism."

And the irony for me is the visual quality of a place like Shanghai. The architecture in this city is some of the most interesting I have seen in the world. However, much of the beauty of building design is concentrated at the very top, where it is invisible because of the ever-present smog in Chinese cities today. The use of coal for heating, the rapidly increasing use of cars (SUVs are popular), over-farming causing dust storms – the reasons for poor air quality and visibility are endless, and the need for an integrated approach and long term vision of sustainable growth is imperative. Looking around, I could see so many examples of how dramatically and how quickly our environment can be negatively effected by our human development and settlement choices.

Happy to be home!
Each time I travel, I learn. I see things done well; and I see things done not so well. Regardless of where I am, however, there's no place like home. I recognize how lucky I am to live where I do. As I step into my second year with the Real Estate Foundation of BC I am also grateful that I get to work with so many interesting and innovative people and organizations, all whom are striving in their different ways to find that balance between settlement and nature that brings quality of life to our neighbourhoods and communities.


about the author:
Karin Kirkpatrick
is the Executive Director of the Real Estate Foundation of BC. Prior to her appointment to that position by the Foundation's Board of Governors in November 1, 2008 she was Director, Centre for CEO Leadership at the Sauder School of Business at the University of BC.

©Real Estate Foundation of BC / 2009
We
strongly encourage the reproduction of articles on this website non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]